Commit 92310e30a0
92310e30a038e3ba117b853fe4ee18326d158721
parent: f30c6a3ff6
Unsigned
cmc <hello@cleberg.net> · 2024-07-26 16:13 UTC
fix broken URLs
Layout: unified · split
content/blog/2021-03-28-gemini-capsule.md
+2 −2
| @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ in June 2019 as an alternative to HTTP(S) or Gopher. In layman's terms, it's an |
| 12 | 12 | alternative way to browse sites (called capsules) that requires a special |
| 13 | 13 | browser. Since Gemini is not standardized as an internet standard, normal web |
| 14 | 14 | browsers won't be able to load a Gemini capsule. Instead, you'll need to use [a |
| 15 | | Gemini-specific browser](https://gemini.%20circumlunar.space/clients.html). |
| 15 | Gemini-specific browser](https://gemini.circumlunar.space/clients.html). |
| 16 | 16 | |
| 17 | 17 | The content found within a Gemini page is called |
| 18 | 18 | [Gemtext](https://gemini.circumlunar.space/docs/cheatsheet.gmi) and is |
| @@ -168,4 +168,4 @@ remote: https://builds.sr.ht/~user/job/689803 [.build.yml] |
| 168 | 168 | ``` |
| 169 | 169 | |
| 170 | 170 | Now that you've properly built your Sourcehut page, you can browse to |
| 171 | | your-username.srht.site in a Gemini browser and view the final results. |
| \ No newline at end of file |
| 171 | your-username.srht.site in a Gemini browser and view the final results. |
content/blog/2021-03-30-vps-web-server.md
+1 −1
| @@ -387,7 +387,7 @@ your actions and make sure you didn't miss any steps. |
| 387 | 387 | |
| 388 | 388 | Many websites have fantastic guides to setting up various web servers. This is |
| 389 | 389 | one of the areas [where DigitalOcean |
| 390 | | shines](https://www.digitalocean.%20com/community/tutorials). For simpler or |
| 390 | shines](https://www.digitalocean.com/community/tutorials). For simpler or |
| 391 | 391 | more Linux-oriented questions, I suggest using [Linuxize] |
| 392 | 392 | (<https://linuxize.com>). |
| 393 | 393 | |
content/blog/2021-08-25-audit-sampling.md
+1 −1
| @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ generation and will allow you to reproduce a sample, given that nothing else |
| 66 | 66 | changes. This is critical to the posterity of audit work. After all, how can you |
| 67 | 67 | say your audit process is adequately documented if the next person can't run the |
| 68 | 68 | code and get the same sample? The final piece here on randomness is to look at |
| 69 | | the [choice](https://docs.%20python.org/3/library/random.html#random.choice) |
| 69 | the [choice](https://docs.python.org/3/library/random.html#random.choice) |
| 70 | 70 | function used above. This is the crux of the generation and can also be examined |
| 71 | 71 | for more detailed analysis on its reliability. As far as auditing goes, we will |
| 72 | 72 | trust that these functions are mathematically random. |
content/blog/2022-07-14-gnupg.md
+4 −4
| @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ or the libraries it uses: |
| 61 | 61 | ([Source](https://www.di.ens.fr/~pnguyen/pub_Ng04.htm)) |
| 62 | 62 | - GPG versions prior to 1.4.2.1 contain a false positive signature |
| 63 | 63 | verification bug. |
| 64 | | ([Source](https://lists.gnupg.%20org/pipermail/gnupg-announce/2006q1/000211.html)) |
| 64 | ([Source](https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-announce/2006q1/000211.html)) |
| 65 | 65 | - GPG versions prior to 1.4.2.2 cannot detect injection of unsigned data. ( |
| 66 | 66 | [Source](https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-announce/2006q1/000218.html)) |
| 67 | 67 | - Libgcrypt, a library used by GPG, contained a bug which enabled full key |
| @@ -69,13 +69,13 @@ or the libraries it uses: |
| 69 | 69 | update in 2017. ([Source](https://lwn.net/Articles/727179/)) |
| 70 | 70 | - The [ROCA Vulnerability](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ROCA_vulnerability) |
| 71 | 71 | affects RSA keys generated by YubiKey 4 tokens. |
| 72 | | ([Source](https://crocs.fi.%20muni.cz/_media/public/papers/nemec_roca_ccs17_preprint.pdf)) |
| 72 | ([Source](https://crocs.fi.muni.cz/_media/public/papers/nemec_roca_ccs17_preprint.pdf)) |
| 73 | 73 | - The [SigSpoof Attack](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SigSpoof) allows an |
| 74 | 74 | attacker to spoof digital signatures. |
| 75 | | ([Source](https://arstechnica.%20com/information-technology/2018/06/decades-old-pgp-bug-allowed-hackers-to-spoof-just-about-anyones-signature/)) |
| 75 | ([Source](https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2018/06/decades-old-pgp-bug-allowed-hackers-to-spoof-just-about-anyones-signature/)) |
| 76 | 76 | - Libgcrypt 1.9.0 contains a severe flaw related to a heap buffer overflow, |
| 77 | 77 | fixed in Libgcrypt 1.9.1 |
| 78 | | ([Source](https://web.archive.%20org/web/20210221012505/https://www.theregister.com/2021/01/29/severe_libgcrypt_bug/)) |
| 78 | ([Source](https://web.archive.org/web/20210221012505/https://www.theregister.com/2021/01/29/severe_libgcrypt_bug/)) |
| 79 | 79 | |
| 80 | 80 | ### Platforms |
| 81 | 81 | |